Legal Opinion

Wellfare v. Realty Trust Co.

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided July 12, 1935No. 1478PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LESLIE, Chief Justice.

This is a usury case, and the charge is based upon acceleration clauses in various notes and deeds of trust, and there is no contention that in the transaction the interest actually provided for in the absence of acceleration would constitute usury. In fact, no contention is made that actual usury was ever collected under the loan contracts.

The plaintiffs, Mrs. E. K. Wellfare and others, instituted this suit against the Realty Trust Company, a corporation, and others,’ alleging that they had theretofore em tered into a usurious contract with W. A. Waldrop, and that later…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Shropshire v. Commerce Farm Credit Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1930
  2. Walker v. Temple Trust Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1935
  3. Shropshire v. Commerce Farm Credit Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1931
  4. Dugan v. LewisTexas Supreme Court · 1891
  5. St. Louis Southwestern Railway Co. v. TodTexas Supreme Court · 1901

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Temple Trust Co. v. HaneyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1937
  2. Ware v. PaxtonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1954
  3. Hamilton v. BillCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1936
  4. Graham & Locke Investments, Inc. v. MadisonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1956
  5. Ford Motor Credit Co. v. McDanielCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1981

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API