Legal Opinion
Debbra Hill v. Michael Astrue
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided October 26, 2012No. 10-35879PublishedCited by 2,162 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
The opinion filed August 7, 2012 is withdrawn. A superseding opinion is being filed concurrently with this order. In the opinion, Part I of the Discussion, paragraph six, penultimate sentence, starting with “Dr. Johnson’s statement” and ending with “Hill faces” shall be amended in full to read as follows:
Dr. Johnson’s statement that Hill would be “unlikely” to work full time was not a conclusory statement like those de-
scribed in 20 C.F.R. § 404.1527(d)(1), but instead an assessment, based on objective medical evidence, of Hill’s likelihood of being able to sustain full time employment…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Maureen Thomas v. Jo Anne Barnhart, Commissioner of the Social Security AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
- Tackett v. ApfelCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
- Orn v. AstrueCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
- Lester v. ChaterCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
- Reddick v. ChaterCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1998
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2,162 opinions
- Treichler v. Commissioner of Social Security AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
- Kim Brown-Hunter v. Carolyn W. ColvinCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2015
- Jasim Ghanim v. Carolyn W. ColvinCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
- Adrian Burrell v. Carolyn W. ColvinCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
- Esin Arakas v. Commissioner, Social SecurityCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2020
2,157 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.