People v. Ross
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtAshburn, J.
After a nonjury trial defendant was convicted of possession of heroin (Health & Saf. Code, § 11500). He appeals from the judgment and an order denying his motion for new trial. The only point urged by counsel is insufficiency of the evidence to support an implied finding that defendant had possession and knowledge of the character of heroin which was found in his room. That knowledge,' as well as possession, is an essential element of the crime is now clear. (People v. Winston, 46 Cal.2d 151, 158 [293 P.2d 40]; People v. Denne, 141 Cal.App.2d 499, 510 [297 P.2d 451]; People v. Antista, 129…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- People v. NewlandCalifornia Supreme Court · 1940
- People v. WinstonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
- People v. DenneCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956
- People v. AntistaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
- People v. Van ValkenburgCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- People v. RedrickCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961
- People v. FloresCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1957
- People v. MagdalenoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1958
- People v. AleriaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1961
- People v. GallagherCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1959
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.