Legal Opinion
People v. Antista
California Court of Appeal
Decided November 19, 1954No. Crim. 5221PublishedCited by 68 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtShinn, P. J.
Defendant Antista and codefendant Rivers were charged with the unlawful possession of marihuana, in violation of the Health and Safety Code, section 11500. Defendants entered pleas of not guilty as charged in the information. In a trial to the court, codefendant Salome Rivers was found not guilty and defendant Bart Antista was found guilty as charged in the information.
Proceedings were suspended and defendant Antista was granted three years’ probation. He appeals from the judgment.
Police Officer Francis A. Cook went to appellant’s apartment about 12:30 a. m. and found codefendant Salome…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- People v. GoryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
- People v. TorresCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1950
- People v. Van ValkenburgCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952
- People v. BledsoeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1946
- People v. One 1940 ChryslerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1946
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by68 opinions
- People v. RedrickCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961
- Alfredo Delgado Arellanes and Geneva Arellanes v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1962
- The People v. MacKIllinois Supreme Court · 1957
- Spataro v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1965
- William Evans and Josephine Evans v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1958
63 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.