Legal Opinion

People v. Magdaleno

California Court of Appeal

Decided February 26, 1958No. Crim. 6104PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAshburn, J.

Having been convicted of possession of heroin (Health & Saf. Code, § 11500), defendant appeals from the judgment and an order denying his motion for new trial. He claims that the evidence is insufficient to support the verdict in that it does not show that he knowingly possessed a narcotic. Any contention of unlawful search or seizure was disclaimed in the trial court and insufficiency of the evidence is the sole ground urged on appeal.

Appellant rented a transient room, Number 115, at the Kendrick Hotel at 322 South Spring Street, Los Angeles, at about 10 a. m. on June 25, 1957. The room had…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. People v. NewlandCalifornia Supreme Court · 1940
  2. People v. GoryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
  3. People v. DenneCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956
  4. People v. TorresCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1950
  5. People v. FosterCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1953

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. People v. RedrickCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961
  2. People v. HurstCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960
  3. People v. AndersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1959
  4. People v. BrajevichCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1959
  5. People v. LopezCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1959

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API