Legal Opinion
In re Norplant Contraceptive Products Liability Litigation
District Court, E.D. Texas
Decided October 4, 1996No. MDL No. 1038PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER DENYING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO CLARIFY ORDER LIMITING THE NUMBER OF PLAINTIFFS PER CASE
SCHELL, Chief Judge.
This matter is before the court on Defendants’ Motion to Clarify Order Limiting the Number of Plaintiffs Per Case that was filed on September 13, 1996. Plaintiffs filed a response on September 24,1996. Counsel on behalf of certain intervenors filed a response on September 27, 1996. Defendants filed a reply on October 1, 1996. Upon consideration of the motion, responses, reply, and applicable law, the court is of the opinion that Defendants’ motion should be DENIED.
In its motion,…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- United Mine Workers of America v. GibbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Nathaniel MOSLEY Et Al., Appellants, v. GENERAL MOTORS CORPORATION Et Al., AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1974
- 17 Fair empl.prac.cas. 528, 14 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 7813 Eddie Stallworth v. Monsanto Company v. J. W. Palmer, Movants-AppellantsCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1977
- Hanley v. First Investors Corp.District Court, E.D. Texas · 1993
3Cited by11 opinions
- In Re Silica Products Liability LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 2005
- Illinois Central RR Co. v. TravisMississippi Supreme Court · 2002
- Insolia v. Philip Morris Inc.District Court, W.D. Wisconsin · 1999
- Adams v. Baxter Healthcare Corp., Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)1999
- Johnson v. Glaxo Smith KlineDistrict Court, S.D. Mississippi · 2002
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.