Legal Opinion

In Re Silica Products Liability Litigation

District Court, S.D. Texas

Decided June 30, 2005No. MDL 1553PublishedCited by 50 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER NO. 29: ADDRESSING SUBJECT-MATTER JURISDICTION, EXPERT TESTIMONY AND SANCTIONS

JACK, District Judge.

Twenty months of pre-trial proceedings and coordinated discovery in the above-styled multidistrict litigation (“MDL”) have culminated in three issues becoming ripe for decision: (1) whether federal subject-matter jurisdiction exists in this MDL’s 111 cases (totaling over 10,000 individual Plaintiffs); (2) whether the doctors who diagnosed Plaintiffs with silicosis employed a sufficiently reliable methodology for their testimony to be admissible; and, (3) whether Plaintiffs’ counsel should…

2Cases cited112 opinions

  1. Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
  2. United Mine Workers of America v. GibbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  3. Kokkonen v. Guardian Life Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  4. Steel Co. v. Citizens for a Better EnvironmentSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
  5. Kumho Tire Co. v. CarmichaelSupreme Court of the United States · 1999

107 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by50 opinions

  1. In Re Global Industrial Technologies, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2011
  2. Rutherford v. Merck & Co., Inc.District Court, S.D. Illinois · 2006
  3. In Re GlobalSanteFe Corp.Texas Supreme Court · 2008
  4. In re Relafen Antitrust LitigationDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2005
  5. In Re Armstrong World Industries, Inc.District Court, D. Delaware · 2006

45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API