In Re Silica Products Liability Litigation
District Court, S.D. Texas
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER NO. 29: ADDRESSING SUBJECT-MATTER JURISDICTION, EXPERT TESTIMONY AND SANCTIONS
JACK, District Judge.
Twenty months of pre-trial proceedings and coordinated discovery in the above-styled multidistrict litigation (“MDL”) have culminated in three issues becoming ripe for decision: (1) whether federal subject-matter jurisdiction exists in this MDL’s 111 cases (totaling over 10,000 individual Plaintiffs); (2) whether the doctors who diagnosed Plaintiffs with silicosis employed a sufficiently reliable methodology for their testimony to be admissible; and, (3) whether Plaintiffs’ counsel should…
2Cases cited112 opinions
- Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- United Mine Workers of America v. GibbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Kokkonen v. Guardian Life Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Steel Co. v. Citizens for a Better EnvironmentSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Kumho Tire Co. v. CarmichaelSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
107 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by50 opinions
- In Re Global Industrial Technologies, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2011
- Rutherford v. Merck & Co., Inc.District Court, S.D. Illinois · 2006
- In Re GlobalSanteFe Corp.Texas Supreme Court · 2008
- In re Relafen Antitrust LitigationDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2005
- In Re Armstrong World Industries, Inc.District Court, D. Delaware · 2006
45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.