Legal Opinion

Tonn v. Reuter

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided March 3, 1959PublishedCited by 40 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCurrie, J.

This appeal is concerned with the rights of an attorney, or law firm, who has been employed by a client to perform a specific task and then is discharged by the client without cause after performance of substantial services.

While there is agreement in the decided cases as to the right of a client to change attorneys, there is sharp disagreement as to whether a client by so doing may subject himself to the payment of damages on the ground of breach of contract. The majority rule is that, where the attorney has been employed to perform specific legal services, his discharge, without cause or…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Martin v. . CampNew York Court of Appeals · 1916
  2. French v. CunninghamIndiana Supreme Court · 1898
  3. Jones v. MartinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953
  4. Mills v. Metropolitan Street Railway Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1920
  5. Williams v. PhiladelphiaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1904

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by40 opinions

  1. Rosenberg v. LevinSupreme Court of Florida · 1982
  2. Pocius v. HalvorsenIllinois Supreme Court · 1963
  3. Cohen v. Radio-Electronics Officers Union District 3Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1996
  4. Lindquist Ford, Inc. v. Middleton Motors, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2009
  5. McQueen, Rains & Tresch, LLP v. CITGO Petroleum Corp.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2008

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API