Legal Opinion

Hawkins v. Schroeter

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided June 16, 1948No. 11834PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

NORVELL, Justice.

The trial court overruled a plea of privilege and the defendants below contend that this was error, insofar as the claims for damages asserted on behalf of the minors Rosie Schroeter and Perry John Schroeter are concerned. Exception 9, of Article 1995, Vernon’s Ann.Civ. Stats., relating to “a suit based upon a crime, offense, or trespass,” is involved.

This action was brought by H. O. Schroe-ter, Olivia Schroeter, his wife, and their children Rosie Schroeter and Perry John Schroeter, as plaintiffs. The last two persons named are minors, twelve and two years of age,…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Hill v. KimballTexas Supreme Court · 1890
  2. Ricker, Lee & Co. v. ShoemakerTexas Supreme Court · 1891
  3. Middlebrook & Brother v. David Bradley Manufacturing Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1894
  4. City of Mineral Wells v. McDonaldTexas Supreme Court · 1943
  5. Thomas v. MeyerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1943

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Brazos Valley Harvestore Systems, Inc. v. BeaversCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1976
  2. King v. LoessinCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1978
  3. Spoon v. PenixTexas Supreme Court · 1967
  4. Western Rock Company v. DavisCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1968
  5. Martinez v. AngersteinCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1974

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API