King v. Loessin
Court of Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
COLEMAN, Chief Justice.
This is an appeal from an order overruling a plea of privilege. The question is whether the action of a purported agent is chargeable to the defendant where the purported agent is the employee of a corporation who was employed to do investigative work for the defendant. The plaintiff asserts that a trespass was committed in the county of suit which authorized venue in that county under Subdivision 9 of Article 1995, VATS. The judgment will be affirmed.
Deicer King, appellant, contracted with Smith Protective Services, Inc. to investigate a number of his competitors in…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- City of Mineral Wells v. McDonaldTexas Supreme Court · 1943
- Taylor v. DunnTexas Supreme Court · 1891
- Magnolia Petroleum Co. v. GuffeyTexas Supreme Court · 1937
- Langford v. KraftCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1973
- Moore Savage v. KopplinCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1911
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Dormady v. Dinero Land & Cattle Co., LC, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)2001
- Hester v. BandyMississippi Supreme Court · 1993
- Stone Resources, Inc. v. Barnett, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1983
- King v. Associates Commercial Corp.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1987
- Gladewater Municipal Hospital v. DanielCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1985
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.