Legal Opinion

King v. Loessin

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided September 21, 1978No. 17172PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

COLEMAN, Chief Justice.

This is an appeal from an order overruling a plea of privilege. The question is whether the action of a purported agent is chargeable to the defendant where the purported agent is the employee of a corporation who was employed to do investigative work for the defendant. The plaintiff asserts that a trespass was committed in the county of suit which authorized venue in that county under Subdivision 9 of Article 1995, VATS. The judgment will be affirmed.

Deicer King, appellant, contracted with Smith Protective Services, Inc. to investigate a number of his competitors in…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. City of Mineral Wells v. McDonaldTexas Supreme Court · 1943
  2. Taylor v. DunnTexas Supreme Court · 1891
  3. Magnolia Petroleum Co. v. GuffeyTexas Supreme Court · 1937
  4. Langford v. KraftCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1973
  5. Moore Savage v. KopplinCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1911

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Dormady v. Dinero Land & Cattle Co., LC, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)2001
  2. Hester v. BandyMississippi Supreme Court · 1993
  3. Stone Resources, Inc. v. Barnett, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1983
  4. King v. Associates Commercial Corp.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1987
  5. Gladewater Municipal Hospital v. DanielCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1985

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API