Legal Opinion
Tuma v. American Can Company
District Court, D. New Jersey
Decided April 26, 1973No. Civ. A. 1421-70PublishedCited by 27 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
LACEY, District Judge.
Plaintiffs, female employees of American Can Company at Hillside, New Jersey, and members of the defendants United Steelworkers of America, International and United Steelworkers of America, Local Union 6301, charge in a nominal class action discrimination in employment based on sex in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e et seq. (1970), and the Equal Pay Act of 1963, 29 U.S. C. § 206(d) (1970). Plaintiffs further allege a violation by defendant Unions of their duty of fair representation.
This matter comes before the Court by…
2Cases cited48 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Skidmore v. Swift & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Vaca v. SipesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- United States v. American Trucking AssociationsSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
- International Union, United Automobile, Aerospace & Agricultural Implement Workers of America v. Hoosier Cardinal Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1966
43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- Northwest Airlines, Inc. v. Transport Workers UnionSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Coye Peterson v. The Oklahoma City Housing Authority, a Public Corporation and State AgencyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1976
- Perez, John T. v. Dana Corporation, Parish Frame Division and United Steelworkers of America, Local Union No. 3733Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1983
- Marshall v. Electric Hose & Rubber Co.District Court, D. Delaware · 1975
- Lloyd v. Stone HarborNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1981
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.