Legal Opinion
Marshall v. Electric Hose & Rubber Co.
District Court, D. Delaware
Decided September 8, 1975No. Civ. A. No. 4708PublishedCited by 40 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
LATCHUM, Chief Judge.
Plaintiffs,1 black, former employees of Electric Hose and Rubber Company (the “Company”) and former members of United Rubber, Cork, Linoleum and Plastic Workers of America and Local 184, United Rubber, Cork, Linoleum and Plastic Workers of America (the “Unions”), have brought this employment and representation discrimination suit against the Company and the Unions under the Labor Management Relations Act of 1947, 29 U.S.C. § 141 et seq., the Civil Rights Act of 1866, 42 U.S.C. § 1981, and Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e et seq.
Currently…
2Cases cited41 opinions
- Hickman v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Eisen v. Carlisle & JacquelinSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Johnson v. Railway Express Agency, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1975
- American Pipe & Construction Co. v. UtahSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Hansberry v. LeeSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by40 opinions
- Laffey v. Northwest Airlines, Inc.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1976
- Charles L. JORDAN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1982
- In re Nasdaq Market-Makers Antitrust LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1996
- Edgar Pauk v. The Board of Trustees of the City University of New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1981
- United Nuclear Corp. v. General Atomic Co.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1980
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.