Standard Fire Insurance Co. v. Griggs
Court of Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
REYNOLDS, Justice.
The trial court, ruling that the word “jewelry” as used in an exclusionary clause of an insurance policy was ambiguous when applied to the Indian belts and bolo ties in controversy and should be construed against the insurer, directed a verdict for the insured on the issue of liability and rendered judgment for the values of the items found by the jury. In its context, the word “jewelry” is not ambiguous and the court should have submitted the requested special issues for the jury to factually determine whether each item was jewelry. Reversed and remanded.
The Standard Fire…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Universal C. I. T. Credit Corp. v. DanielTexas Supreme Court · 1951
- White v. WhiteTexas Supreme Court · 1943
- Ramsay v. Maryland American General Insurance Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1976
- De La Cruz v. Combined American Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1975
3Cited by7 opinions
- Kelly Associates, Ltd. v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1984
- Continental Casualty Co. v. AllenDistrict Court, N.D. Texas · 1989
- Entzminger v. Provident Life & Accident Insurance Co., Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1983
- Food Source, Inc. v. Zurich Ins. Co., Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1988
- Amoco Canada Petroleum Company, Ltd. v. Wild Well Control, Inc. v. Illinois Union Insurance Company, Intervenor-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1989
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.