Legal Opinion
Amoco Canada Petroleum Company, Ltd. v. Wild Well Control, Inc. v. Illinois Union Insurance Company, Intervenor-Appellee
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Decided December 5, 1989No. 89-2014PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
JOHNSON, Circuit Judge:
Appellants, Amoco Canada Petroleum Company, Ltd. (“Amoco”) and Wild Well Control, Inc. (“Wild Well”), appeal from the district court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of appellee, Illinois Union Insurance Company (“Illinois Union”). The district court determined that the umbrella policy issued by Illinois Union to Wild Well did not provide coverage under the facts of this case. This Court affirms.
I. FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY
Appellant Wild Well is in the business of controlling well fires and escaping oil, gas, and condensate. Illinois Union issued a $5,000,000.00…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Barnett v. Aetna Life Insurance Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1987
- Ideal Mutual Insurance Co. v. Last Days Evangelical Ass'nCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1986
- Harbor Insurance Company, Plaintiff-Counterclaim v. Trammell Crow Company, Inc., and Chasewood Construction Company, Defendants-CounterclaimCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1988
- Standard Fire Insurance Co. v. GriggsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1978
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Matter of Haber Oil Co., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1994