People v. Dennis
California Court of Appeal
[Opinion certified for partial publication.*]
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
CARR, J.
A jury convicted defendant of mayhem (Pen. Code, § 203) 1 and assault by means of force likely to produce great bodily injury (§ 245, subd. (a)) and found true all alleged special circumstances and enhance ments. * 2 After the jury found defendant was sane at the time he committed the offenses, the court imposed concurrent life terms as mandated by statute. (§ 667.7.)
On appeal, defendant contends (1) the trial court erred in not granting defendant’s motion for a change of venue (§ 1033); (2) the injury inflicted did not constitute mayhem; (3) the trial court erred in not…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- People v. MorseCalifornia Supreme Court · 1964
- Archibald Lyles v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1958
- People v. RamosCalifornia Supreme Court · 1984
- People v. ModestoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967
- State v. HoodSupreme Court of Vermont · 1963
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- People v. KellyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992
- People v. Ralph International ThomasCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992
- People v. DeHoyosCalifornia Supreme Court · 2013
- People v. YoungCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1987
- People v. HillCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1994
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.