Legal Opinion

People v. Modesto

California Supreme Court

Decided May 23, 1967No. Crim. 10267PublishedCited by 93 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtTobriner, J.

For the third time, a jury has found defendant guilty of the first degree murders of Connie and Mary Mack and has fixed the penalty at death.1 This appeal is automatic. (Pen. Code, § 1239, subd. (b).)

The record before us suggests seven possible bases for reversing the judgment below. After careful examination, we find them all to be without merit.

We examine here the contentions (1) that the trial court should have granted defendant’s motion for a change of venue; (2) that defendant’s statements to the police should *700have been excluded; (3) that the evidence adduced by the prosecution failed to…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  3. Escobedo v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  4. Pointer v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  5. Griffin v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by93 opinions

  1. People v. FryeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1998
  2. People v. HughesCalifornia Supreme Court · 2002
  3. People v. RamosCalifornia Supreme Court · 1984
  4. People v. CoffeyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967
  5. People v. CarterCalifornia Supreme Court · 2005

88 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API