Legal Opinion
People v. Hill
California Court of Appeal
Decided April 1, 1994No. A059436PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
KLINE, P. J.
Marlowe Hill appeals from convictions of mayhem and aggravated assault. He contends the trial court gave an erroneous instruction pertaining to the mayhem count and improperly imposed the aggravated term in sentencing on that count. We affirm the conviction but remand for resentencing.
Statement of the Case
Appellant was charged by information filed on May 13, 1992, with one count of assault by means of force likely to produce great bodily injury (Pen. Code, § 245, subd. (a)(1)) 1 and one count of aggravated mayhem (§ 205). It was further alleged that appellant inflicted…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- People v. WatsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
- Perkins v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1982
- People v. McKelvyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1987
- United States v. Earl CookCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1972
- People v. FerrellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1980
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- People v. CookCalifornia Supreme Court · 2015
- People v. VerlindeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2002
- People v. SantanaCalifornia Supreme Court · 2013
- People v. WilliamsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1996
- People v. NewbyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.