Legal Opinion

Roche Vitamins, Inc. v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Decided November 20, 2014No. 2013-1568PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LOURIE, Circuit Judge.

The United States (“the government”) appeals from the decision of the United States Court of International Trade reclassifying Roche Vitamin Inc.’s (“Roche”) product BetaTab 20% (“BetaTab”) as “Provitamins, unmixed” under subheading 2936.10.00 of the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (“HTSUS”). See Roche Vitamins, Inc. v. United States, 922 F.Supp.2d 1353 (Ct. Int’l Trade 2013) (“Opinion ”). Because the Court of International Trade correctly classified BetaTab under heading 2936, we affirm.

Background

Roche imported BetaTab, which is a mixture containing…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Orlando Food Corp. v. StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1998
  2. National Advanced Systems v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1994
  3. Motorola, Inc, Plaintiff-Cross v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2006
  4. Degussa Corp. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2007
  5. Home Depot U.S.A., Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2007

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Irwin Industrial Tool Company v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2019
  2. Otter Products, LLC v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2015
  3. Apple Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2019
  4. Second Nature Designs Ltd. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2023
  5. Aero Rubber Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2019

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API