Legal Opinion

Apple Inc. v. United States

United States Court of International Trade

Decided March 11, 2019No. Slip Op. 19-32; Court No. 13-00239PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Kelly, Judge:

The action before the court concerns the classification of two models of the iPad 2 Smart Cover ("Smart Cover"). Plaintiff, Apple, Inc., moves for summary judgment, requesting the court find, as a matter of law, that both models of Plaintiff's imports are properly classified within subheading 8473.30.51, Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (2011) ("HTSUS"),1 and order United States Customs and Border Protection ("CBP" or "Customs") to reliquidate the subject merchandise as such and refund the excess duties paid with interest. Pl.'s Mem. Law Supp. of Pl.'s Mot. Summary…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  3. Kokkonen v. Guardian Life Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  4. Simon v. Eastern Kentucky Welfare Rights OrganizationSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  5. United States v. Mead Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2001

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Apple Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2020
  2. Second Nature Designs Ltd. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2023

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API