United States v. King
U.S. Army Court of Military Review
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION ON FURTHER REVIEW
WERNER, Judge:
The appellant was convicted of forcible sodomy of another soldier, aggravated assault with a dangerous weapon and violation of a lawful general regulation by possessing a switchblade knife in violation of Articles 92, 125, and 128 of the Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. §§ 892, 925 and 928 (1982). His approved sentence included a dishonorable discharge, confinement for ten years, and forfeiture of all pay and allowances. This court affirmed the findings and sentence and denied appellant’s petition for a new trial. United States v.…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- United States v. ScottUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1987
- United States v. RivasUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1977
- United States v. WheelerUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1986
- United States v. KingU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1988
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- United States v. BramelU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1990
- United States v. SuarezU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1991
- United States v. AustinU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1991
- United States v. BostickU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1991
- Michael W. King v. Col. Larry B. Berrong, Jr., Commandant, UsdbCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1994