Legal Opinion
Smith v. Onyx Oil & Chemical Co.
District Court, D. Delaware
Decided April 2, 1954No. Civ. A. 1333PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
LEAHY, Chief Judge.
' 1. This is an action for breach of contract. Plaintiffs seek damages for loss of profits and expenses incurred because of repudiation by defendant of the agreement.
Plaintiffs, Laurence C. Smith and Laura G. Smith, are partners trading as Laurence C. Smith Co. in Syracuse, New York. The firm has been for years engaged in distributing dry cleaning supplies and equipment to establishments, laundries, institutions, hospitals and laundermats.
Defendant Onyx is a Delaware corporation. It has been for 43 years engaged in the manufacture and - sale of chemical products. It is a…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Klaxon Co. v. Stentor Electric Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Marks v. . CowdinNew York Court of Appeals · 1919
- Ryan v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
- Brosious v. Pepsi-Cola Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1946
- Stentor Electric Mfg. Co. v. Klaxon Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1942
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Smith v. Onyx Oil & Chemical Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1955
- Smith v. Onyx Oil And Chemical CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1955
- Becton, Dickinson and Company v. BioMedomics, Inc.District Court, E.D. North Carolina · 2021