Legal Opinion

Brown v. PEOPLES NAT. BK. OF WASH.

Washington Supreme Court

Decided December 13, 1951No. 31711PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFinley, J.

This is an action for damages for wrongful attachment under Rem. Rev. Stat., § 654 [P.P.C. § 11-15]. The trial court sustained a demurrer to the complaint. The action was dismissed. Plaintiffs elected not to plead further, and have appealed.

Obviously, the question involved is whether the complaint states a cause of action for wrongful attachment under the aforementioned statute. It is our opinion that it does not.

On September 17, 1947, the Peoples National Bank of Washington, one of the respondents, sued the Browns, appellants. The bank was seeking to recover on a conditional sale contract.…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. McGill v. W. P. Fuller & Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1907
  2. Painter v. MunnSupreme Court of Alabama · 1897
  3. Palo Savings Bank v. CameronSupreme Court of Iowa · 1918
  4. Sweeny v. Sweeny Investment Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1939
  5. Gutter v. JoinerWashington Supreme Court · 1909

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. West v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1957
  2. Wagner Development, Inc. v. Fidelity & Deposit Co.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1999
  3. Pay 'N Save Corp. v. EadsCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1989
  4. Tri-State Development, Ltd. v. JohnstonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1998
  5. 98 Daily Journal D.A.R. 11,267, 98 Daily Journal D.A.R. 12,271 Tri-State Development, Ltd., a Washington Corporation v. David A. Johnston Gayle Johnston John H. Shields, Pierce County Sheriff, Attorney General of the State of Washington, Defendant-IntervenorCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1998

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API