Palo Savings Bank v. Cameron
Supreme Court of Iowa
Appeal from Linn District Court. — John T. Moffit, Judge. This action was originally begun by the plaintiff against the defendant, George W. Cameron, to recover a sum claimed to be due it from Cameron. In this action the plaintiff sued out an attachment, and levied upon a certain stock of goods owned by Cameron. At the time of the levy, the goods were mortgaged. Thereafter, the mortgagees appeared and claimed the property under their mortgage.
Read the full summary
Appeal from Linn District Court. — John T. Moffit, Judge. This action was originally begun by the plaintiff against the defendant, George W. Cameron, to recover a sum claimed to be due it from Cameron. In this action the plaintiff sued out an attachment, and levied upon a certain stock of goods owned by Cameron. At the time of the levy, the goods were mortgaged. Thereafter, the mortgagees appeared and claimed the property under their mortgage. A receiver was appointed to take charge of the property, pending 'the controversy between the mortgagees and the attaching creditor. The mortgagees…
1Opinion of the CourtGaynor, J.
Though tried separately in the court below, and separate appeals taken and separate abstracts *185filed, two cases are submitted to us, to be considered together and disposed of in one opinion. This is done because the preliminary facts are common to both cases, and are necessarily considered in the disposition of each.
1. Chattel mortgages: validity: withholding from record. I. The plaintiff, the Palo Savings Bank, is a corporation organized under the laws of this state, and was, at the time of the happening of the matters hereinafter referred to, doing business as such in the town of Palo, Linn…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Goll & Frank Co. v. MillerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1893
- Emerson & Co. v. ConverseSupreme Court of Iowa · 1898
- Falker v. LinehanSupreme Court of Iowa · 1893
- Liddle v. AllenSupreme Court of Iowa · 1894
- Richards v. Jewett Bros. & Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1902
3Cited by10 opinions
- Barber v. Reina Nash Motor CompanyWyoming Supreme Court · 1953
- Brown v. PEOPLES NAT. BK. OF WASH.Washington Supreme Court · 1951
- Midland Shoe Co. v. A. L. & K. Dry Goods Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1927
- Castleman v. StrykerOregon Supreme Court · 1923
- Baxter v. BaxterSupreme Court of Iowa · 1928
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.