Legal Opinion
National Labor Relations Board v. Deena Artware, Inc.
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided February 23, 1960No. 46PublishedCited by 173 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Douglas
This litigation has been long and drawn out and the present case is merely a small segment of it. In 1949 petitioner found that respondent Deena Artware, Inc. (Artware), had violated the National Labor Relations Act, 61 Stat. 136, 29 U. S. C. § 158 (a), by discharging and refusing to reinstate 66 employees who had engaged in a strike (86 N. L. R. B. 732, 95 N. L. R. B. 9); and it ordered Artware “and its officers, agents, successors, and assigns” to offer reinstatement to those employees and to make them whole for any loss of pay suffered by them as a result of the discriminating action. The…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Regal Knitwear Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Berkey v. Third Avenue Railway Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1926
- Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co. v. Minneapolis Civic & Commerce Ass'nSupreme Court of the United States · 1918
- Pulllman's Palace Car Co. v. Missouri Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1885
- United States v. Lehigh Valley RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1911
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by173 opinions
- Robert H. E. Frank, Jerry D. Mooberry, Tyrone G. Moreno v. U.S. West, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1993
- First National City Bank v. Banco Para El Comercio Exterior De CubaSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Wells Fargo & Co. v. Wells Fargo Express Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1977
- National Labor Relations Board v. Browning-Ferris Industries of Pennsylvania, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1982
- Textile Workers Union v. Darlington Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1965
168 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.