Simoy v. United States
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
JUDGMENT
2Per curiam
This appeal was considered on the record from the United States District Court for the District of Columbia and on the brief filed by appellants Jose F.S. Simoy, Douglas A. Anderson, Jr., and Michael P. Paalan. It is
ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the district court’s judgment filed January 9, 2004, be affirmed. The district court properly dismissed the claims of appellants Simoy, Anderson, and Paalan for military pay and allowances because the judgments on the merits in the prior suits (as cited in the complaint and the record on appeal) bar claims involving the same parties based on the…
3Cases cited7 opinions
- Parklane Hosiery Co. v. ShoreSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Federated Department Stores, Inc. v. MoitieSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- E. Howard Hunt, Jr. v. Liberty Lobby, IncCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1983
- Paalan v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2002
- Paalan v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2003
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.