Legal Opinion

Frost v. Akin

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided July 11, 1916No. 7241PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Error from District Court, Blaine County; James R. Tolbert, judge. Action by E. M. Prost and others against Lee A. Akin and another. Judgment for defendants. Plaintiffs bring error.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

RUMMONS, C.

Plaintiffs in error, plaintiffs below, commenced this action in the district court of Blaine county, to enjoin the collection of a judgment rendered against plaintiffs, E. M. Prost, as adminis trator of tlie estate of Wm. A. Frost, deceased, and Myrtle Rogers, then Myrtle Frost, and others, in an action by school district No. 71 of Blaine county, upon the official bond of one J. O. Frost, as treasurer of said school' district. The school district was joined with the sheriff as a defendant. The defendants demurred to the petition of plaintiffs, which demurrer was sustained…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Hockaday v. JonesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1899
  2. Harris v. SmileySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
  3. Crist v. CosbySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1902
  4. Choi v. TurkSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
  5. Bilby v. StuartSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Pettis v. JohnstonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1920
  2. Stumpff v. PriceSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1918
  3. Dardenne v. DanielsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924
  4. Amos v. JohnstonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1933
  5. George v. KinardSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1921

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API