Legal Opinion

Amos v. Johnston

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided February 21, 1933No. 21197PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWelch, J.

The plaintiff, Albert Amos, commenced this action as cause No. 6776, in the district court of Garvin county. Okla., to cancel various deeds and recover certain lands in said county which he claimed to own as the heir of Jasper Amos, deceased, full-blood Mississippi Choctaw Indian,, to whom the land was allotted, and plaintiff specifically alleged that a certain deed appearing of record, dated November 19, 1923, purporting to have been executed by plaintiff and conveying this land to the defendant E. Johnston, and purporting to have been approved by the judge of the county court of Garvin…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Pettis v. JohnstonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1920
  2. State ex rel. Happel v. District CourtMontana Supreme Court · 1909
  3. Turner v. FlemingSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
  4. Harris v. SmileySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
  5. Crist v. CosbySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1902

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Dickason v. DickasonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1980
  2. Harjo v. JohnstonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1940
  3. Eberle v. Sinclair Prairie Oil Co.District Court, E.D. Oklahoma · 1940
  4. Flynn v. VandersliceSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
  5. Boettcher Oil & Gas Co. v. WestmolandSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1941

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API