Legal Opinion

Haville v. Pearrow

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided May 15, 1961No. 5-2390PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Carretón Harris, Chief Justice.

On January 2, 1959, appellees, Carl Pearrow and wife, filed a substituted complaint against appellants, Duke Haville and wife, for damages resulting from an automobile collision, the complaint alleging appellants to be residents of Zachary, Louisiana, and former residents' of Bussell, White County, Arkansas. Summons was issued and served upon the Secretary of State by the Sheriff of Pulaski County. A registered letter, with return receipt requested, was sent to appellants at Zachary, and returned, with a notation in the upper right hand corner of the envelope,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Chambliss v. ReppySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1891
  2. Knights of Maccabees of the World v. GordonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1907
  3. O'Neal v. B. F. Goodrich Rubber CompanySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1942
  4. Merriott v. KilgoreSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1940

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Davis v. SchimmelSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1972
  2. Halliman v. StilesSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1971
  3. Meisch v. BradyCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1980
  4. Jetton v. FawcettSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1978
  5. Bruce v. PaxtonDistrict Court, E.D. Arkansas · 1962

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API