Legal Opinion
In Re BOND FORFEITURE IN COCHISE COUNTY
Court of Appeals of Arizona
Decided June 28, 2013No. CAUSE NO. CR201100916; 2 CA-CV 2012-0161PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
KELLY, Judge.
¶ 1 Appellant Azteca Bail Bond, LLC, (Az-teca) challenges the trial court’s judgment forfeiting a $75,000 appearance bond it had posted on behalf of a criminal defendant. Azteca argues the trial court erred by ordering forfeiture because the bond was void and unenforceable under article II, § 22 of the Arizona Constitution. We affirm.
Factual and Procedural Background
¶2 We view the facts in the light most favorable to upholding the court’s ruling. In re Bond Forfeiture in Pima Cnty. Cause No. CR-20031154, 208 Ariz. 368, ¶ 2, 93 P.3d 1084, 1085 (App.2004). In December 2011,…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- City of Tucson v. Clear Channel Outdoor, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2008
- State v. MurphyArizona Supreme Court · 1976
- Heath v. KigerArizona Supreme Court · 2008
- Segura v. CunananCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2008
- State v. GarrettCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1972
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- State of Tennessee v. Latickia Tashay BurginsTennessee Supreme Court · 2015