In Re Platt
Supreme Court of Vermont
1Opinion of the CourtBarney, J.
The plaintiff works nine, and occasionally ten, days a month each month for his employer. He had previously applied for and received unemployment compensation for the remaining two weeks of each month. The claim was reviewed in the fall of 1970, and the payments terminated. This denial was confirmed at all levels of the Department of Employment Security, including a final review before the Employment Security Board.
An appeal was taken here from that board under V.R.A.P. Rule 13(d), and three questions certified. These questions may . be summarized briefly: (1) does the evidence support the…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Nurmi v. Vermont Employment Security BoardSupreme Court of Vermont · 1963
- In Re HatchSupreme Court of Vermont · 1972
- Dubkowski v. Administrator, Unemployment Compensation ActSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1963
- Willard v. Vermont Unemployment Compensation CommissionSupreme Court of Vermont · 1961
- Bernotas Unemployment Compensation CaseSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1954
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Holton v. Department of Employment & TrainingSupreme Court of Vermont · 2005
- Golden v. Industrial Commission, Division of Employment SecurityMissouri Court of Appeals · 1975
- Commonwealth v. HortonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
- In Re BarcombSupreme Court of Vermont · 1974
- Ellis v. Department of Employment SecuritySupreme Court of Vermont · 1975
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.