Legal Opinion

In Re Barcomb

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided February 5, 1974No. 113-73PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKeyser, J.

This is an appeal from the decision of the Vermont Employment Security Board denying appellant’s claim for unemployment compensation benefits under Title 21 of the Vermont Statutes Annotated.

The following facts are not in dispute. The appellant resided in Enosburg Falls, and was employed as a turner and presser for John’s Dress Manufacturing Company in Richford, Vermont. In the spring of 1972, she left this wort because she had no way to travel the ten miles from Enosburg Falls to Richford.

Subsequently, claimant began working at Sonny’s Dress Shop in Enosburg Falls but due to financial…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Dandridge v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. San Antonio Independent School District v. RodriguezSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  3. Shapiro v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  4. Dunn v. BlumsteinSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  5. Eisenstadt v. BairdSupreme Court of the United States · 1972

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Keough v. Director of the Division of Employment SecurityMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1976
  2. Aronstam v. CashmanSupreme Court of Vermont · 1974
  3. Hadwen, Inc. v. Department of TaxesSupreme Court of Vermont · 1980
  4. Fleury v. Kessel/Duff Construction Co.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1988
  5. Palucci v. Department of Employment SecuritySupreme Court of Vermont · 1977

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API