Legal Opinion

Walden v. Locke

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided June 26, 2009No. Civil Action 08-1720 (RWR)PublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

RICHARD W. ROBERTS, District Judge.

Plaintiff Lorraine Walden brings claims against the Secretary of the United States Department of Commerce 1 alleging race, sex, and religious discrimination under Ti- tie VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and 42 U.S.C. § 1981. The Secretary moves to dismiss for improper venue and for untimeliness, or in the alternative for summary judgment, or for transfer of venue to the Eastern District of Virginia. Because the District of Columbia is not an appropriate venue for Walden’s Title VII claims, but the Eastern District of Virginia…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Darby v. U.S. Department of EnergyDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2002
  2. James v. Booz-Allen & Hamilton, Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 2002
  3. Pendleton v. MukaseyDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2008
  4. Hunter v. JohannsDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2007
  5. Relf v. GaschCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1975

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. Fam v. Bank of America NA (USA)District Court, District of Columbia · 2017
  2. Slaby v. HolderDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2012
  3. McLaughlin v. HolderDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2012
  4. Johnson v. Deloitte Services, LLPDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2013
  5. Shay v. Sight & Sound Systems, Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 2009

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API