Legal Opinion

General Accident Fire & Life Assurance Corp. v. Cosgrove

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided April 5, 1950PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHughes, J.

Both parties agree that the sole question in this case is whether damages flowed to appellant as a result of respondent’s failure to settle the bill of exceptions. This is obviously a question of law properly disposed of on motion for summary judgment.

Appellant further concedes that it had the burden of satisfying the trial court that it sustained damages as a result of respondent’s negligent conduct. It contends that it has discharged such duty in this case and that the trial court should have recognized that fact and entered judgment for it.

Examination of the record in the original action…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Crawley v. HillWisconsin Supreme Court · 1948
  2. Ruka v. ZiererWisconsin Supreme Court · 1928
  3. Hustad v. EvettsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1939
  4. Volkmann v. Fidelity & Casualty Co. of New YorkWisconsin Supreme Court · 1946
  5. Ebel v. RehorstWisconsin Supreme Court · 1933

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Helmbrecht v. St. Paul InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Charles Reinhart Co. v. WiniemkoMichigan Supreme Court · 1994
  3. BASIC Food INDUSTRIES, INC v. GRANTMichigan Court of Appeals · 1981
  4. Millhouse v. WiesenthalTexas Supreme Court · 1989
  5. Hansen v. WightmanCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1975

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API