Volkmann v. Fidelity & Casualty Co. of New York
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtBarlow, J.
The questions presented are whether, from the credible evidence, the court properly determined as a matter of law that the infant plaintiff was negligent in respect to his manner of crossing the street, and that the comparative negligence attributable to the plaintiff was more than fifty per cent, contrary to the answers of the jury in the special verdict.
No claim of error is made on the admission of evidence or in the charge to the jury. The only claim by appellants is that the court erred in changing the answers to subdivisions (c) of questions 3 and 4, and in changing the answer to…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Guderyon v. Wisconsin Telephone Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1942
- Ruka v. ZiererWisconsin Supreme Court · 1928
- Callaway v. KryzenWisconsin Supreme Court · 1938
- Vanlydegraf v. ScholzWisconsin Supreme Court · 1942
- Saley v. Hardware Mutual Casualty Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1945
3Cited by6 opinions
- Schweitzer Ex Rel. Schweitzer v. AndersonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1957
- General Accident Fire & Life Assurance Corp. v. CosgroveWisconsin Supreme Court · 1950
- Zeise v. DepreyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1948
- Volkmann v. Fidelity & Casualty Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1948
- Lawver v. City of Park FallsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1967
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.