Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

In Re Mooney

California Supreme Court

Decided October 29, 1937No. Crim. 3898PublishedCited by 56 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

THE COURT.

By this proceeding in habeas corpus, the petitioner, Thomas J. Mooney, seeks his release from the custody of the warden of the state prison at San Quentin, where he is confined pursuant to a judgment on a verdict finding him guilty of murder of the first degree.

At 2:06 P. M., on July 22, 1916, a devastating crime was committed in the city of San Francisco. At that moment a dynamite homb, concealed in a suitcase and detonated by means of a clockwork device, was exploded at Steuart and Market Streets, in the midst of numerous persons who either were watching or about to participate in…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Mooney v. HolohanSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
  2. People v. MooneyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1918
  3. Skipper v. SchumacherSupreme Court of Florida · 1936
  4. People v. BillingsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1917
  5. People v. MooneyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1918

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by56 opinions

  1. People v. AdamsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1949
  2. People v. MansonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1976
  3. In Re ConnorCalifornia Supreme Court · 1940
  4. People v. RomeroCalifornia Supreme Court · 1994
  5. In Re LindleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947

51 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API