Legal Opinion
Stabilus v. Haynsworth, Baldwin, Johnson & Greaves
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided October 1, 1992No. Civ. A. No. 91-6184PublishedCited by 30 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
NAYTHONS, United States Magistrate Judge.
Presently before the Court is the Motion of Defendant, Haynsworth, Baldwin, Johnson and Greaves, P.A., to compel complete responses to interrogatories and request for production of documents, the response and memorandum of Plaintiff, Stabilus, in opposition to Defendant’s motion, and Defendant’s reply to Plaintiff’s memorandum in opposition.
The action brought by plaintiff is a claim of legal malpractice, in which defendant is accused of giving defective legal advice to plaintiff in connection with certain union contract negotiations…
2Cases cited51 opinions
- Upjohn Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Oppenheimer Fund, Inc. v. SandersSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- In Re Grand Jury Proceedings. Appeal of Fmc Corporation, Douglas E. Kliever and Cleary, Gottlieb, Steen & HamiltonCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1979
- Sinclair Refining Co. v. Jenkins Petroleum Process Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1933
- Heat & Control, Inc. v. Hester Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1986
46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by30 opinions
- Fassett v. Sears Holdings Corp.District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2017
- Alexander v. Federal Bureau of InvestigationDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1998
- Clemens v. New York Central Mutual Fire InsuranceDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2014
- United States v. BertoliDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1994
- Corrigan v. Methodist HospitalDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1994
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.