Legal Opinion

Crider v. Holbrook

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided January 16, 1930No. 7288PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHill, J.

1. “Tlie refusal of a judge to grant an ad interim restraining order in advance of the -time set for tlie hearing of an application for a temporary injunction is not reviewable. Hollingshead v. Lincolnton, 84 Ga. 590 [10 S. E. 1094]; Mayor of Savannah v. Grayson, 104 Ga. 508 [31 S. E. 149]; Smith v. Willis, 107 Ga. 793 [33 S. E. 667].” Ivey v. Rome, 126 Ga. 806 (55 S. E. 1034). The foregoing ruling was followed in Dorminey v. Moore, 144 Ga. 207 (86 S. E. 536) ; Kennedy v. Edenfield, 159 Ga. 816 (126 S. E. 779). And see Harris v. Sparta, 130 Ga. 60, 61 (60 S. E. 192).

3. In the present case the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Hollinshead v. Town of LincolntonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1890
  2. Smith v. WillisSupreme Court of Georgia · 1899
  3. Waller v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1898
  4. Ivey v. City of RomeSupreme Court of Georgia · 1906
  5. Kennedy v. EdenfieldSupreme Court of Georgia · 1925

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Grizzel v. GrizzelSupreme Court of Georgia · 1939
  2. City of Cedartown v. PickettSupreme Court of Georgia · 1942
  3. Butler v. Spiller Inc.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1931
  4. Corbin v. ShadburnSupreme Court of Georgia · 1933
  5. Avary v. City of AtlantaSupreme Court of Georgia · 1965

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API