Sharwell Bros. Shoe Co.. v. United States
United States Customs Court
1Opinion of the Court
Beckworth, . Judge:
The merchandise; involved in this appeal for reappraisement consists of men’s insulated'; boots and children’s black side zipper boots,, imported from Japan and entered at the port of New York on November 6,1962.
It was appraised on-the basis of export value, as. that value is defined in section 402(b) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended by the Customs Simplification Act of 1956, at the invoiced units of value, less items marked “X” (ocean freight and insurance premium). Plaintiffs do not contest the basis of value but claim that the correct values are:
Item Price per pair
Me…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- United States v. Supreme Merchandise Co.United States Customs Court · 1962
- Valley Knitting Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1960
- Haddad & Sons, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1964
- S. S. Kresge Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1960
- Luckytex, Ltd. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1965
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- United States v. Knit WitsUnited States Customs Court · 1969
- Concord Electronics Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1972
- Sharwell Bros. Shoe Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1968
- United States v. Louis Goldey Co.United States Customs Court · 1970
- Concord Electronics Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1971