Legal Opinion

Kay Corporation v. Anderson

Washington Supreme Court

Decided December 28, 1967No. 38910PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHill, J.

This is a boundary-line dispute with the plaintiff claiming to the line described in instruments of record executed by a common grantor and seeking to oust the defendants from a claimed encroachment. The defendants in possession are claiming that all the land they occupy is within the lines staked on the ground and agreed to between the common grantor and a purchaser—the predecessor in interest of the defendants. The property has been occupied to the latter lines by the purchaser (the Dyes) and their successors in interest at all times since the sale in 1956. The plaintiff, which acquired…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Atwell v. OlsonWashington Supreme Court · 1948
  2. Inmon v. PearsonWashington Supreme Court · 1907
  3. Alverson v. HooperWashington Supreme Court · 1919

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. In Re DavisWashington Supreme Court · 2004
  2. In re the Personal Restraint of DavisWashington Supreme Court · 2004
  3. Wolfkill Feed & Fertilizer Corp. v. MartinCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2000
  4. Wolfkill Feed & Fertilizer Corp. v. MartinCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2000
  5. Jones v. Halvorson-BergCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1993

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API