Legal Opinion
Oklahoma City v. McAllister
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided October 15, 1935No. 25599PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtRiley, J.
This is an appeal from a judgment in thel sum of $500, in favor of defendant in error, plaintiff below, and against the municipal corporation, defendant below.
E. A. McAllister for eight years owned, farmed, and occupied a residence located upon 160 acres of land near Luther, Okla. The waters of Deep Fork creek flow through the farm of plaintiff. The municipal corporation emptied a part of its sewage into Deep Fork creek, and by reason of inadequate facilities and improper treatment, this sewage gave off foul and offensive odors about plaintiff’s farm. As a result of this sewage the waters of…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Baltimore & Potomac Railroad v. Fifth Baptist ChurchSupreme Court of the United States · 1883
- Swift v. BroylesSupreme Court of Georgia · 1902
- Oklahoma City v. TyteniczSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
- Oklahoma City v. WestSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1931
- Junction City Lumber Co. v. SharpSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1909
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Oklahoma City v. EylarSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1936
- City of Altus v. MartinSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1939
- Truelock v. City of Del CitySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1998
- Midwest City v. EckroatSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1963
- City of Okmulgee v. WallSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1943
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.