Midwest City v. Eckroat
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
1Opinion of the Court
BLACKBIRD-, Chief Justice.
In this action defendants in error instituted in May, 1959, as plaintiffs, they sought recovery of damages against the plaintiff in error, as defendant, on account of injuries they allegedly sustained by reason of the defendant city’s construction and maintenance of a sewage disposal and digester unit, or plant, across the road from plaintiffs’ farm.
In their petition, plaintiffs alleged the erection and maintenance of the unit “ * * in the Winter and Spring of 1957 * * * ”; and, in their first alleged cause of action, sought the sum of $25,000.00 in damages for…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Daniel v. Fort Worth & Rio Grande Railway Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1903
- Vestal v. Gulf Oil Corp.Texas Supreme Court · 1951
- Liberty Plan Co. v. Francis T. Smith Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1961
- Oklahoma City v. EylarSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1936
- Aldridge v. PattersonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1954
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Panama Processes, S.A. v. Cities Service Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1990
- Sopkin v. Premier Pontiac, Inc.Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1975
- Kepler v. StrainSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1978
- Truelock v. City of Del CitySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1998
- Bridal v. Cottonwood Creek Conservancy District No. IISupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1965
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.