Legal Opinion

Rau v. McCorkle

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division

Decided October 11, 1957PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

47 N.J. Super. 36 (1957)

135 A.2d 224

FRANK RAU, WARREN DAVIDSON, JAMES KIERNAN AND RONALD K. KRAMER, PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS,

v.

LLOYD McCORKLE, WARDEN, NEW JERSEY STATE PRISON, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Submitted September 23, 1957.

Decided October 11, 1957.

Before Judges GOLDMANN, FREUND and CONFORD.

Mr. Frank Rau, Mr. Warren Davidson, Mr. James Kiernan and Mr. Ronald K. Kramer, plaintiffs-appellants, pro se.

Mr. Grover C. Richman, Jr., Attorney-General of New Jersey, for defendant-respondent (Mr. Eugene T. Urbaniak, Deputy Attorney-General, attorney).

The…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. People Ex Rel. Barrett v. BartleyIllinois Supreme Court · 1943
  2. In Re Application of KershnerSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1952
  3. Adams v. WatersCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1951
  4. Heinze v. Butte & Boston Consolidated Min. Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1903
  5. Bonnett v. KeifferOregon Supreme Court · 1925

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Janiec v. McCorkleNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1958
  2. Commonwealth ex rel. Bonomo v. HaasSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1968
  3. Walsh v. State Ex Rel. EymanArizona Supreme Court · 1969
  4. State v. Von AtzingerNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1963
  5. Application of ButlerCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1959

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API