Legal Opinion

Bonnett v. Keiffer

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided June 16, 1925PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMcBBIDE, C. J.

Objection is made to certain instructions in relation to the statute of limitations and the statute of frauds, but in view of the fact that the jury found specially that the alleged contract was never made, these instructions, even if erroneous as claimed, could not have affected the verdict or the result in any way.

The objection most strongly and plausibly made is to the giving, by the court, of the two instructions above quoted.

It is contended that Section 3c of Article VII of our Constitution in some way has prescribed a rule of evidence which takes the place of the old rule enunciated in…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Branch v. LambertOregon Supreme Court · 1922
  2. Scott v. Merrill's EstateOregon Supreme Court · 1915

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Chiordi v. JerniganNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1942
  2. Grillo v. Bd. of Realtors of Plainfield AreaNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1966
  3. Levy v. C. Young Construction Co., Inc.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1957
  4. Sarnicandro v. Lake Developers, Inc.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1959
  5. State v. SmithNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1964

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API