Legal Opinion

State Bank of Stephen v. Farmers Grain Co.

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided June 8, 1928No. 26,603PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHilton, J.

Plaintiff appeals from an order denying its alternative motion for judgment non obstante or for a new trial.

This is an action in conversion. ' Plaintiff claimed title to certain grain of the alleged value of $5,000 by virtue of a chattel mortgage executed by one Pagnac. A verdict was returned in favor of defendants.

Pagnac was indebted to the State Bank of Stephen on two promissory notes, each bearing date November 6, 1923, one for $1,566.79 and the other for $1,500. These notes were secured by the chattel mortgage referred to, which by its terms covered mortgagor’s one-half interest in the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Simmons v. AndersonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1890
  2. Endreson v. LarsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1907
  3. McMahan v. LundinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1894
  4. Christianson v. NelsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1899

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Schnirring v. StubbeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1929
  2. Massey-Harris Harvester Co. v. Moorhead Farmers Elevator Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1928
  3. Zeigler v. Citizens' Bank of VenusCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1935
  4. Pro-Vid-All Mills, Inc. v. Cargill, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1966
  5. Purdie v. LekveSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1930

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API