Legal Opinion

Purdie v. Lekve

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided April 4, 1930No. 27,731Published

1Opinion of the CourtHolt, J.

The case was tried to the court and findings made in favor of intervener. Plaintiff appeals from the order denying his motion for a new trial.

The facts are not in dispute. Shortly stated they are: On December 31, 1924, L. G. Howser, the owner of a 160-acre farm in Polk county, this state, executed a chattel mortgage to the intervener upon one-third of the crop to be sown and harvested during 1925 to secure the payment of promissory notes in the sum of $606.09, which mortgage was duly filed in the register of deeds office of Polk county on January 2, 1925. On March 30, 1925, Howser leased the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. National Surety Co. v. WinslowSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1919
  2. Isbell v. SletteMontana Supreme Court · 1916
  3. Simmons v. AndersonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1890
  4. Christianson v. NelsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1899
  5. Tweto v. HortonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1903

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API