Pro-Vid-All Mills, Inc. v. Cargill, Inc.
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
Nelson, Justice.
In this action to determine which of two mortgagees is entitled to the proceeds of the sale of a flock of turkeys, defendant, Cargill, Inc., appeals from an order denying its motion for a new trial and from paragraphs 2, 3, and 5 of the judgment entered. Plaintiff, Pro-Vid-All Mills, Inc., also seeks review of the order denying its motion for a new trial and of paragraph 1 of the judgment.
Prior to July 15, 1961, Harold Effing, who was engaged in raising turkeys in Kanabec and Mille Lacs Counties, had been financed in his operations by Nutrena Mills, Inc., then a subsidiary of…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Ludlum v. RothschildSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1889
- First National Bank v. St. Anthony & Dakota Elevator Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1927
- Schnirring v. StubbeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1929
- St. Paul Electric Co. v. Baldwin Engineering Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1924
- Goodrich Silvertown Stores of the B. F. Goodrich Co. v. A. & A. Credit System, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1937
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.