Legal Opinion

Simmons v. Anderson

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided November 14, 1890PublishedCited by 18 opinions

Plaintiff recovered a judgment of $84.55 against defendant, in justice’s court, in an action for conversion of grain. An appeal, on questions of law only, to the district court for Swift county, was tried by Baxter, J., and the judgment of the justice was reversed. Plaintiff appeals from the judgment of the district court.

1Opinion of the CourtMitoheld, J.

This was an action for the alleged wrongful conversion of certain grain, which plaintiff claimed under a chattel mortgage executed to him by one Maxwell. The defendant in his answer denied plaintiff’s right to the property, and alleged ownership in himself. The burden was therefore on plaintiff to establish his claim. *488The evidence, so far as it tends to prove anything, shows that on March 16, 1888, Maxwell executed to plaintiff a mortgage on all the crops which had been or might thereafter be sown, grown, or raised ■during the year 1888 on a certain tract of land then in possession of…

2Cited by18 opinions

  1. Isbell v. SletteMontana Supreme Court · 1916
  2. McMaster v. EmersonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1899
  3. Twin Falls Bank & Trust Co. v. WeinbergIdaho Supreme Court · 1927
  4. Endreson v. LarsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1907
  5. Louis v. HansenSupreme Court of Iowa · 1928

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API