Ammon v. Narragansett Dairy Co.
District Court, D. Rhode Island
In Equity. Suit by Ammon & Person against the Narragansett Dairy Company, Limited.
1Opinion of the Court
BROWN, District Judge.
Though the opinion already filed (252 Fed. 276) holds that the plaintiffs are entitled to an injunction, and that the defendant’s cross-bill must be dismissed, yet it appears that the former Narragansett Dairy Company had used as a trade-mark *209applied to goods the word “Queen” alone for about three years prior to any use of the word alone by the plaintiffs as a trade-mark applied to goods. This use by that company or by the defendant had been very substantial and continuous in New England and elsewhere from 1909 to September 29, 1915, the date of plaintiffs’ notice to…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Hanover Star Milling Co. v. MetcalfSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
- Hamilton-Brown Shoe Co. v. Wolf Brothers & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1916
- Westinghouse Electric & Manufacturing Co. v. Wagner Electric & Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1912
- G. & C. Merriam Co. v. SaalfieldCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1912
- Lincoln v. FrenchSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Dickinson v. O. & W. THUM CO.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1925
- Champion Spark Plug Co. v. ReichDistrict Court, W.D. Missouri · 1941