Legal Opinion
Dickinson v. O. & W. THUM CO.
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided October 9, 1925No. 4113, 4114, 4126PublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WESTENHAVER, District Judge.
The prior history of this litigation is in part disclosed in former opinions. See, 245 F. 609, 158 C. C. A. 37; (D. C.) 254 F. 219; 257 F. 394, 168 C. C. A. 434. The controversy involves an infringement by Dickinson of a trade-mark of the Thum Company applied to sticky fly paper, and also unfair trade and competition by Dickinson in marketing his competitive product. The Thum fly paper is designated in the record as “Tanglefoot,” and Dickinson’s as “Sticky Fly Paper,” and sometimes merely as “Sticky.” The Thum Company will be referred to herein as the plaintiff,…
2Cases cited44 opinions
- Messenger v. AndersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
- Tilghman v. ProctorSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
- Kimberly v. ArmsSupreme Court of the United States · 1889
- Hamilton-Brown Shoe Co. v. Wolf Brothers & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1916
- Root v. Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1882
39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Wynn Oil Company, Plaintiff-Appellee/cross-Appellant v. American Way Service Corporation, and Thomas A. Warmus, Defendants-Appellants/cross-AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1991
- Shapiro, Bernstein & Co. v. Remington Records, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1959
- Commercial Nat. Bank of Independence v. Stockyards Loan Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1926
- Crawford v. BriantCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1931
- N. S. W. Co. v. Wholesale Lumber & Millwork, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1941
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.