Legal Opinion

Champion Spark Plug Co. v. Reich

District Court, W.D. Missouri

Decided November 3, 1941No. 2979Published

1Opinion of the Court

REEVES, District Judge.

Because of a complete disagreement between counsel on the questions (a) as to the comprehensiveness of the decree, and (b) whether an accounting should be ordered, I find it necessary to prepare, after a review of the authorities, a brief memorandum opinion.

1. The question as to the comprehensiveness of the decree is dependent upon the opinion of the Court of Appeals reported, 8 Cir., 121 F.2d 769.

*167 The point made by the defendant is that the decree should not be extended to forbid the retention of the “type-mark” of the plaintiff on his reconditioned spark plugs. A…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Puerto Rico v. Shell Co. (PR), Ltd.Supreme Court of the United States · 1937
  2. Hamilton-Brown Shoe Co. v. Wolf Brothers & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1916
  3. Safe Deposit & Trust Co. of Baltimore v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1929
  4. Wright v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  5. White v. AronsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1937

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API